The other approach of 'less than' also works. It may be fairly common to see a class end at one number while the next starts at the same number, but this is incorrect/poor practice because as pointed out one value falls in two classes. Most software won't render a single layer with a value in two classes, it will create a definitive class break (which is why the default labels will also be 0-150, 150.1 - 500 or something, with the number of decimals related to the attribute field definition). Technically the class break is what will set it. Either of your solutions works, because if 0-149 and 150-500, the tenths isn't shown so rounding applies 149.anything is less than 150. (Edit: and I guess the whole gradient thing has already been covered, though nobody really went clearly into the why imho.)Īs for the debate between /u/NecroSky and /u/cadifor the basic rule is don't overlap ranges. The labeling is fine as is, the problem is the way the symbology is being depicted next to those labels. What /u/Mr_M00 should really do is us the ramp for the legend rather than just single color squares. And that's the real problem, the legend is only showing the color for five specific elevations, though it's using a ramp to show continuous data. That color represents a specific elevation, not a range - this is not a choropleth and the data isn't classified, it's continuous. ![]() This is a screencast showing how the inkscape-embroidery extension is used to create an embroidery design. The comment regarding the elevation ranges that you and others include is technically incorrect. Beginner Tutorial Series on our YouTube-Channel.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |